Optimization Of Sulfuric Acid Leaching Of Copper From A Cu–Fe Oxidized Ore From Kongo Central Province, Democratic Republic Of Congo
Abstract
The investigated ore was mainly composed of cuprite (Cu₂O), malachite (Cu₂CO₃(OH)₂), and limonite (5Fe₂O₃·2SiO₂·9H₂O). Mineralogical and chemical characterizations were performed using X-ray diffraction, atomic absorption spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma analysis, and conventional chemical methods. Leaching experiments were carried out using a fractional factorial experimental design in order to evaluate the effects of acid formality, particle size, temperature, slurry density, and stirring speed on copper and iron dissolution.
The results showed that acid formality (AF) and slurry density (SD) were the most influential parameters controlling copper extraction. The developed optimization model for copper leaching was expressed as:
Y = 0.284 + 0,183FA - 0.070 DS + ε
Optimal operating conditions were obtained at an acid formality of 0.40 mol·dm⁻³, a particle size between 90 and 125 µm, a temperature of 50–60°C, an agitation speed of approximately 550 rpm, and a solid/liquid ratio of 1/10. Under these conditions, copper extraction reached 65.9%, whereas iron dissolution remained limited to 1.02%.
Kinetic investigations revealed that an optimal residence time of two minutes allowed selective copper extraction with minimal iron co-dissolution. One extraction stage theoretically yielded 54.7% copper extraction while dissolving only 0.5% iron. Repetition of the leaching process over several stages could therefore selectively exhaust copper from the ore.
This study demonstrates the potential of sulfuric acid hydrometallurgy combined with factorial experimental design for the selective recovery of copper from oxidized Cu–Fe ores in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
. Crundwell, F. K., Moats, M. S., Ramachandran, V., Robinson, T. G., & Davenport, W. G. (2011). Extractive metallurgy of nickel, cobalt and platinum-group metals.
. Davenport, W. G., King, M., Schlesinger, M., & Biswas, A. K. (2002). Extractive metallurgy of copper (4th ed.).
. Dreisinger, D. (2006). Copper leaching from primary sulfides: Options for biological and chemical extraction of copper. Hydrometallurgy, 83(1–4), 10–20.
. Gupta, C. K., & Mukherjee, T. K. (1990). Hydrometallurgy in extraction processes (Vol. 1).
. Habashi, F. (1993). A textbook of hydrometallurgy. Métallurgie Extractive Québec.
. Habashi, F. (1999). Handbook of extractive metallurgy (Vol. 2). Wiley-VCH.
. Montgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and analysis of experiments (9th ed.).
. Northey, S., Haque, N., Mudd, G., & Weng, Z. (2014). A life cycle assessment of copper and nickel production from ore to metal. Minerals Engineering, 65, 68–76.
. United States Geological Survey (USGS). (2015). Mineral commodity summaries 2015: Copper. U.S. Geological Survey.
. Vignes, A. (2009c). Métallurgie extractive 3: Opérations, procédés et filières d’élaboration. Lavoisier.
. VIGNES, Alain, Métallurgie extractive 1. Base thermodynamique et cinétique, Paris Hermer Lavoisier, 2009.
. VIGNES, Alain. Métallurgie extractive 3.Opération, procédé et filière d’élaboration, Paris Hermer Lavoisier, 2009.
. VIGNES, Alain. Métallurgie extractive 2. Principes et propriétés physico-chimiques, Paris Hermer Lavoisier, 2009
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v59.1.8682
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Patrick Ngoie Mululu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

















