Intelligent Video Surveillance in Agadir: Info-Communicational Mediation and Social Acceptability Challenges in an Emerging Metropolis

Fatiha MAKACH

Abstract


The integration of algorithmic video surveillance in Agadir's urban space, as part of the national strategy for the development of Smart Cities, raises fundamental questions at the intersection of information and communication sciences, urban sociology, and data ethics. This article offers an empirical and theoretical analysis of the social acceptability of intelligent video surveillance (IVS) through a quantitative survey conducted among 200 residents of the Agadir metropolitan area (February 2026). The results reveal a dual communicational paradox. On the one hand, 78.6% of respondents perceive IVS as a necessary technological advance, while 90.5% are unaware of the conditions governing the retention of and access to their data. On the other hand, while 54.8% believe that the city does not communicate sufficiently about its Smart City projects, 59.5% trust the technology itself. By analyzing these dynamics through the conceptual lenses of media framing, algorithmic governmentality, and info-communicational mediation, this study demonstrates that citizen resistance is structurally linked to an institutional communication deficit rather than technophobic opposition. Subsequently, a semantic requalification model is proposed, which operates a discursive shift from the register of "surveillance" to that of "urban service," as a strategic lever for ensuring the social sustainability of Smart City projects in emerging metropolises.

Keywords


Smart City, Intelligent Video Surveillance, Social Acceptability, Info-communicational Mediation, Algorithmic Governmentality, Semantic Requalification

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid surveillance: A conversation. Polity Press.

Barns, S. (2021). Platform Urbanism: Negotiating Platform Ecosystems in Connected Cities. Palgrave Macmillan.

Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R., & Di Feliciantonio, C. (2021). Citizens in the Smart City: Participation, Co-production, and Governance. Routledge.

Davallon, J. (2004). Mediation: communication on trial? MEI - Mediation and Information, No. 19, 37-59.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Foucault, M. (1978). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France (1977-1978). Gallimard/Seuil.

Galdon, G. (2013). (Not so) smart cities?: The drivers, impact and risks of surveillance-enabled smart environments. Science and Public Policy, 40(6), 71-73. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct070

Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left. University of California Press.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.

Habermas, J. (1997). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Gallimard.

Harroud, T. (2017). The New Cities program in Morocco: rupture or continuation of a catch-up urbanism? Revue internationale d’urbanisme, No. 4.

Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126

National Commission for the Control of the Protection of Personal Data (CNDP). (2009). Law No. 09-08 relating to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data. Official Bulletin No. 5714 of 5 March 2009. Government of Morocco.

Sadowski, J. (2021). Too smart: How digital capitalism is altering our cities. The MIT Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v59.1.8579

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 fatiha MAKACH

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.