Email this article 
Grammatical Competence among Pre-service Teachers: Implications to Language Instruction
Abstract
Grammatical competence plays a critical role in overall linguistic proficiency, especially for future educators. This study investigated the level of grammatical competence among 81 pre-service teachers in Cebu, Philippines, and explored its relationship with sex, initial age of exposure to English as a Second Language, and academic specialization. The research employed a mixed-methods approach, combining a descriptive-quantitative design to assess grammar levels and a thematic-qualitative design to explore perceived contributing factors. Findings revealed that most participants were female, had been introduced to English during their formative years, and were specializing in Physical Education. The majority demonstrated an upper intermediate level of grammatical competence, indicating the ability to handle complex grammatical structures with some precision. Statistical analysis showed that sex, age of initial English exposure, and specialization had no significant relationship with grammatical competence. Participants identified five key factors as contributors to their current grammar proficiency: consistent use of English as a medium of communication, exposure to English literary texts, frequent practice of productive language skills, constructive feedback from mentors and peers, and individual motivation and attitude. It is concluded that while demographic and academic variables do not significantly affect grammatical competence, language instruction in teacher education programs should prioritize enhancing the identified influencing factors. Curriculum development should focus on universally applicable strategies to elevate pre-service teachers' grammatical proficiency to an advanced level, thereby improving their effectiveness as future language educators.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Quines ZM. Grammatical competence and its impact to listening and speaking proficiency: An analysis. Eur J Engl Lang Lit Stud. 2023;11(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.37745/ejells.2013/vol11n2112
Sacal PGY, Potane JD. Students' mastery of English grammar towards effective writing and speaking competence. Int J Multidiscip Appl Bus Educ Res. 2023;4(8):2894–2904. http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.08.27
Ikram B. The effect of grammatical errors on students’ writing performance: a case study of second year LMD students of English language at Mohamed Khider University Biskra [Master’s thesis]. Biskra (DZ): Mohamed Kheider University of Biskra; 2017.
Long RW, Hatcho Y. Gender as a variable in grammatical accuracy. J Asia TEFL. 2018;15(3):566–899. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.3.26.890
Lahuerta A. Analysis of accuracy in the writing of EFL students enrolled on CLIL and non-CLIL programmes: the impact of grade and gender. Lang Learn J. 2020;48(2):121–132.
Cagurangan MLM. Grammatical competence of teacher education students [undergraduate thesis]. Tuguegarao City (PH). 2018.
Pablo JM. Assessing the English grammar proficiency of online Filipino English teachers. Int J Open Distance e-Learn. 2022;8(2).
Andilab DL, Amante EC. Grammatical competence and grammatical knowledge of senior secondary students in the new normal: learning interventions. J Ongoing Educ Res. 2024;1(2):92–103.
Cervantes FM. SWS: 47% of Filipinos 'competent' with English language. Philippine News Agency [Internet]. 2023 Aug 16 [cited 2024 Aug 16]. Available from: https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1207936
Garnham A, Oakhill J, Stockhausen LV, Sczesny S. Editorial: Language, cognition, and gender. Front Psychol. 2017;8:772. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00772
Tomakin E. An analysis of EFL students' learning main and subskills in terms of hand usage, study style and gender. Afr Educ Res J. 2020;8:109–123.
Merza HNM. English grammar competence of Filipino college freshmen. J Posit Sch Psychol. 2022;6(4):2949–2958.
Furtina D, Fata IA, Fitrisia D. Grammatical errors in writing task: males vs. females. Proc EEIC. 2016;1(1):251–258.
Azizmohammadi F, Barjesteh H. On the relationship between EFL learners' grammar learning strategy use and their grammar performance: learners' gender in focus. J Lang Teach Res. 2020;11(4):583–592.
Baghaei S, Baghaei S. Relationship between creativity and grammar learning strategy use: a case of Iranian advanced EFL learners. Int J Foreign Lang Teach Res. 2022;10(41):89–101.
Erviona L, Arsyad S. Gender differences and their impacts on students’ performance in speaking ability. J Engl Spec Purp Indones. 2022;1(1):43–49.
Calfoforo AA. Grammar and written discourse competence of BA English students. Int J Soc Sci Hum Res. 2023;6(3):1565–1570. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i3-30
Ahsanah F. Gender and age differences in the use of language learning strategies by junior and senior high school students. J Engl Teach. 2020;6(1). https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v6i1.1405
Sanjaya I, Sitawati AAR. The effect of grammatical accuracy and gender on interlanguage request strategy. TEFLIN J. 2017;28(2).
Pushpanathan T. Assessment of grammatical competencies of polytechnic students. Think India J. 2019;22(4):6092–6097.
Jia S. A study on the influence of age on learning effectiveness of English second language learners. In: 2022 3rd International Conference on Language, Art and Cultural Exchange (ICLACE 2022); 2022 Jul; Atlantis Press. p. 74–84.
Rubio F. The impact of early language learning. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages; 2022.
Temurovna OK. Is age a crucial factor when learning a second language? Excell Int Multidiscip J Educ. 2024;2(8):46–50.
Ganjoee MA, Narafshan MH. A study on the effect of age on the representation and processing of second language grammar achievement. Stud Engl Lang Teach. 2017;4(2):223–240.
Armea AP, Castro MP, Llamado MN, Lotino RB, San Esteban AA, Ocampo DM. English proficiency and literary competence of English major students: predictor for effective language and literature teaching. Online Submiss. 2022;12(1):141–151.
Rodriguez E. Language learning strategies and grammatical competence of the English-major students in Zamboanga del Norte HEIs. Spring J Arts Humanit Soc Sci. 2023;2(4):27–42.
Compe AS. English proficiency level of secondary students. Int J Educ Res. 2017;5(11).
Sari F, Atmanegara Y, Manurung JE, Ali HV, Amaliah A. Analyzing non-English major students’ needs, attitudes, and English language learning strategies. Englisia. 2023;11(1):110–127.
Roca RMC, Manla EC. Grammatical competence level and grammar learning strategy of pre-service teachers. Eur J Engl Lang Teach. 2023;8(2).
Blackburn S. The link between math and language skills [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Aug 16]. Available from: www.mheonline.com/research
Sinno S, El Takach S. The efficacy and relevancy of the language courses in the preparation of elementary science and mathematics prospective teachers. Int J Res Educ Sci. 2020;6(1):179–201.
Villegas AM, SaizdeLaMora K, Martin AD, Mills T. Preparing future mainstream teachers to teach English language learners: a review of the empirical literature. Educ Forum. 2018;82(2):138–155.
Yeong IJ. Preservice teacher learning for supporting English language learners to make sense of Mathematics [dissertation]. Columbia (US): University of Missouri; 2017.
Fu Y, Wang J. Assessing mainstream pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy to teach English language learners. Int J Instr. 2021;14(3):153–174. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1439a
Oxford Online English. English grammar level test - Oxford Online English [Internet]. 2022 Aug 23 [cited 2024 Sept 20]. Available from: https://www.oxfordonlineenglish.com/english-level-test/grammar
Tuan VV. Communicative competence of the fourth year students: Basis for proposed English language program. English Language Teaching. 2017;10(7):104–22. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n7p104
Alova CA, Alova IM. Grammatical and academic writing competence of special science class students. Puissant. 2023;4:747–63.
Cacho RM, Abenes RD, Dejapa RR, Mapula HRD. Employability of Technology and Livelihood Education graduates. Int J Eval Res Educ. 2022;11(4). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.2320739
Mezei VG. Incorporating grammar instruction into ESAP courses for students in Physical Education and Sport and Kinesitherapy. In: Wohl E, editor. Specialized Languages: Perspectives and Lines of Convergence. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană; 2019.
Savignon SJ. Communicative competence. In: The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. 2018:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0047
Doehler SP. Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse. 2018;9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759
Salas MKT, Legaspi JB. Language learning exposure and grammatical proficiency of intermediate pupils. Philipp Soc Sci J. 2020;3(2).
Faryadi Q. Effectiveness of Facebook in English language learning: A case study. Open Access Libr J. 2017;4(11). https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.110401
Xiuwen Z, Razali AB. An overview of the utilization of TikTok to improve oral English communication competence among EFL undergraduate students. Univ J Educ Res. 2021;9(7):1439–51. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090710
Muftah M. Impact of social media on learning English language during the COVID-19 pandemic. PSU Res Rev. 2024;8(1):211–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-10-2021-0060
Zheng H, Miao X, Dong Y, Yuan DC. The relationship between grammatical knowledge and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. In: Reading and Writing Skills: Cognitive, Emotional, Creative, and Digital Approaches. Front Psychol. 2023;14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1098568
Huijun N, Rafizah R. The effectiveness of English literature reading in improving reading skills and reading comprehension. Int J Engl Lang Lit Stud. 2024;13(2):157–72.
Hofweber J, Graham S. Linguistic creativity in language learning: Investigating the impact of creative text materials and teaching approaches in the second language classroom. Scott Lang Rev. 2017;(33).
Duncan S, Paran A. The effectiveness of literature on acquisition of language skills and intercultural understanding in the high school context. Int Baccalaureate Organ. 2017.
Faminiano MT, Yango AR. Netflix viewing habit, grammatical competence, and academic self-efficacy of selected senior high school students in Tagaytay City, Cavite. Technium Soc Sci J. 2023;44(1):316–31. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v44i1.8947
Galendez K, Ong C. Video-based learning in language education: Student experiences and teacher perspectives. Int J Soc Sci Human Res. 2024;7(2):1181–3. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i02-37
Dewi DS. Grammatical knowledge: Does it affect listening comprehension? Anglo-Saxon. 2017;8(2):152–7. https://doi.org/10.33373/anglo.v8i2.1214
Mart CT. Integrating listening and speaking skills to promote speech production and language development. MEXTESOL J. 2020;44(2).
Aldobekhi SA, Abahussain MO. Enhancing English language students' productive skills through project-based learning: A mixed method research. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res. 2024;23(1):300–17. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.12
Shin M. Effects of project-based learning on students’ motivation and self-efficacy. Engl Teach. 2018;73(1):95–114. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.1.201803.95
Okyar H, Eksi G. Training students in peer interaction and peer feedback to develop competence in L2 forms. PASAA J Lang Teach Learn Thail. 2019;58:62–94.
Owu-Ewie C, Williams R. Grammatical and lexical errors in students' English composition writing: The case of three senior high schools (SHS) in the Central Region of Ghana. Sino-US Engl Teach. 2017;14(8):463–82. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2017.08.001
Ramendra DP, Juniarta PAK, Putrayasa IB. The analysis of grammatical errors in university students' essays. J Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran. 2021;54(3):571–81. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i3.41023
Fitrawati B, Safitri D. Students' grammatical errors in essay writing: A pedagogical grammar reflection. Int J Lang Educ. 2021;5(2):74–88. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i2.15241
Alsehibany RA. EFL Saudi students' attitudes toward peer feedback activities in a writing class. PSU Res Rev. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/PRR-01-2021-0004
Whipp PR, Pengelley R. Confidence building through peer observation of teaching and peer coaching in university departments: A good investment for some and not others. Int J Mentor Coach Educ. 2017;6(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-07-2016-0059
Yomtov D, Plunkett SW, Efrat R, Marin AG. Can peer mentors improve first-year experience of university students? J Coll Stud Retent Res Theory Pract. 2017;19(1):25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115611398
Eğinli İ, Solhi M. The impact of practicum on pre-service EFL teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: First step into professionalism. Shanlax Int J Educ. 2021;9(4):223–35. https://doi.org/10.34293/
Mackenzie RA. Primary educators' knowledge of grammatical concepts as mandated in the Australian curriculum (English): Comparison of pre and in-service teachers [dissertation]. Perth (AU): Curtin University; 2017.
Oktaviani D, Susilohadi G. Correlational study between grammatical competence, students' interest in writing, and writing skill [thesis]. Surakarta (ID): Universitas Sebelas Maret of Surakarta; 2017.
Asgari M, Ketabi S, Amirian Z. Interest-based language teaching: Enhancing students' interest and achievement in L2 reading. Iran J Lang Teach Res. 2019;7(1):61–75.
Yuksel D, Soruç A, Horzum B, McKinley J. Examining the role of English language proficiency, language learning anxiety, and self-regulation skills in EMI students' academic success. Stud Second Lang Learn Teach. 2023;13(2):399–426. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.38280
Valizadeh M, Soltanpour F. The flipped pedagogy: Effects on the grammatical competence and writing skill of basic users of English. Int J Instr. 2020;13(3):761–76. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13351a
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v51.2.7359
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jessa Altamera Sestoso, Ed Adrianne Joy Baritua, Rio Rose Jurcales, Anjaylou Polinar Monisit, Akeisha Raye Quiñanola, Remedios Bacus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.